AB 2216 Withdrawn. Landlord May Still Charge Pet Rent, Pet Deposits and Deny Tenancy to Pet Owners.

 

Good news for Landlords. Bad news for current and prospective tenants with pets. California Assembly Bill 2216 (AB 2216), titled "Tenancy: Common Household Pets," has been withdrawn and is no longer under consideration in the current legislative session. The bill, introduced by Assembly-member Matt Haney in February 2024, aimed to prevent landlords from denying tenancy to renters with common household pets and sought to prohibit the imposition of additional pet-related fees or rent. The bill was met with vigorous opposition by the landlord lobby.

Legislative Journey of AB 2216

AB 2216 was introduced with the intent to address the challenges faced by pet-owning renters in California. The proposed legislation sought to:

• Prohibit landlords from inquiring about a prospective tenant's pet ownership before accepting their application.
• Require tenants to inform landlords of pet ownership plans at least 72 hours before entering into a rental agreement.
• Prevent landlords from denying tenancy based on pet ownership without reasonable justification.
• Disallow the charging of additional rent or fees specifically for pet ownership.

The bill garnered support from animal rights organizations and aimed to increase the availability of pet-friendly rental housing. However, it faced significant opposition from property owners and real estate associations concerned about property damage and the autonomy of landlords to set terms for their properties.

Property owners argued that the decision to allow pets should remain at their discretion, enabling them to make choices based on the specific circumstances of their properties and renters.

Their primary concerns raised included:

• Property Damage: Pets can cause significant damage to rental units, leading to costly repairs that may not be fully covered by pet deposits.
• Allergies and Safety: The presence of pets could affect other renters, particularly those with allergies or fears of certain animals.
• Increased Liability: Rental owners would face increased liability risks, including potential bites or attacks from pets, which could result in legal and insurance complications.
  

Amendments and Opposition

In response to the opposition, several amendments were made to AB 2216 to address concerns:

• Exemptions for smaller properties were introduced, recognizing the unique challenges faced by owners of such units.
• Provisions allowing landlords to charge pet deposits and fees were included, aiming to mitigate potential property damage risks.

Despite these amendments, opposition remained strong. Organizations like the East Bay Rental Housing Association (EBRHA) and the California Rental Housing Association (CalRHA) actively lobbied against the bill, arguing that it infringed upon landlords' rights and could lead to increased operational challenges. Their concerted efforts contributed to the decision to withdraw the bill from consideration.

Ebrha

Implications for Renters and Landlords

The withdrawal of AB 2216 means that the existing regulations regarding pet ownership in rental properties remain unchanged. Landlords retain the discretion to set pet policies, including the ability to:

• Prohibit pets entirely in their rental units.
• Charge additional pet rent or fees to cover potential damages or increased wear and tear.
• Establish specific conditions or restrictions related to pet ownership, such as size or breed limitations.

For renters, this outcome underscores the importance of:

• Reviewing lease agreements carefully to understand pet-related policies and any associated costs.
• Communicating openly with potential landlords about pet ownership to ensure compliance with property rules.
• Seeking pet-friendly housing options proactively, as landlords are not mandated to accommodate pets.

Future Considerations

The debate surrounding AB 2216 highlights the ongoing tension between increasing housing accessibility for pet owners and preserving landlords' rights to manage their properties. While this particular bill has been withdrawn, the issues it sought to address remain pertinent. Advocates for pet-friendly housing may continue to pursue legislative or policy changes in the future.

Both renters and landlords should stay informed about potential new proposals or local ordinances that could impact pet policies in rental housing. Engaging an experienced California landlord tenant attorney or California real estate attorney can help balance the needs and concerns of both parties in the rental market.

 By: Desiree T. Washington, Esq. at Washington Law Firm

Finding a Personal Injury Lawyer in California

Accidents and injuries are an unfortunate part of life, and when they happen due to someone else's negligence, it can be especially challenging to navigate the legal and healthcare systems to seek compensation and justice. Desiree T. Washington, Esq., explains how you can obtain legal help to initiate and resolve your personal injury claim. 

In Los Angeles County, one of the most populous and diverse counties in the United States, the personal injury process is complex but essential for those who have suffered harm to receive some measure of relief. With this article, Desiree aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the personal injury process in Los Angeles County, from the initial incident to the resolution of a personal injury claim, and how you can utilize Washington Law Firm to find just compensation for your injuries. 

1. Seek Medical Attention 

The first and most crucial step following a personal injury in Los Angeles County, as anywhere else, is to seek immediate medical attention. Your health should always be the top priority. Not only does prompt medical care ensure that you receive the necessary treatment, but it also creates a crucial medical record that can serve as evidence later in your personal injury claim. 

Hospitals may ask you for medical insurance. You should inform them that you were in an accident so that they may ensure all paperwork pertinent to your claim is filled out and that you receive the urgent medical care you need to prevent further harm. Do not worry if you do not have medical insurance. A hospital cannot legally turn you away for not having insurance. Simply inform them that you were in an accident and to forward your invoice to your attorney, Desiree T. Washington at Washington Law Firm. Make sure you receive copies of all documents you sign, and that the hospital gives you, and forward those documents to Washington Law Firm, including any detailed records of all medical bills, prescriptions, and treatment plans. 

2. Gather Evidence 

After seeking medical attention, it's essential to gather as much evidence as possible related to your injury and the incident that caused it. This may include:

a. Photographs: Take pictures of the accident scene, your injuries, and any property damage. These visual records can provide valuable proof later on. 

b. Witness Statements: If there were any witnesses to the accident, collect their contact information and statements. Witness testimonies can corroborate your version of events. 

c. Police Report: If the injury resulted from a car accident, slip and fall, or any other incident where law enforcement responded, obtain a copy of the police report. This report often contains valuable information about the accident's circumstances and the parties involved. 

d. Documentation: Keep records of all relevant documents, such as medical bills, receipts, and correspondence related to your injury. 

3. Consult an Attorney 

Hiring a personal injury attorney is critical to you obtaining the restitution you need to be made whole after your accident. Washington Law Firm will help you understand your rights, evaluate the strength of your case, and guide you through the complex legal process. Desiree T. Washington offers free initial consultations to assess your situation and provide initial guidance. 

Many Los Angeles County law firms now charge a contingency fee of upwards of 50% of your claim. DO NOT agree to those terms. They are exorbitant, unethical and will prevent you from being made whole by any injury award you may receive. Instead, demand the attorneys receive not more than 33% which should include all legal fees and costs. 33% has been the standard for contingency fees for over 100 years. At Washington Law Firm, Desiree will never charge more than 33% on contingency fee cases. 

4. Statute of Limitations 

It's essential to be aware of the statute of limitations for personal injury cases in California. In general, you have two years from the date of the injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. If you miss this deadline, you may lose your right to pursue a claim. However, some exceptions and nuances may apply, so contact Washington Law Firm to understand how the statute of limitations applies to your specific case. 

5. Negotiation with the Insurance Company

In many personal injury cases, the injured party will need to negotiate with the insurance company of the at-fault party. It's essential to have your attorney handle these negotiations to ensure that you receive a fair settlement. Insurance companies absolutely will try to minimize payouts, so it is crucial that you contact Washington Law Firm to deal with your insurers. 

6. Filing a Lawsuit

If negotiations with the insurance company do not result in a fair settlement, Washington Law Firm recommends filing a lawsuit. This formal legal action initiates the litigation process. Desiree will prepare the necessary documents, including a complaint that outlines the details of your case, and file them with the appropriate court in Los Angeles County. 

7. Discovery Process

Once a lawsuit is filed, both parties engage in the discovery process. This involves gathering evidence, questioning witnesses, and exchanging information. Discovery can be a time-consuming and is a detailed process, often lasting over a year based on the nature and extent of your injuries. However, it is crucial for building a strong case. 

8. Mediation and Settlement Discussions 

Before proceeding to trial, many personal injury cases in Los Angeles County go through mediation or settlement discussions. These processes aim to resolve the case without the need for a court trial. A neutral mediator facilitates discussions between the parties to reach a mutually agreeable settlement. Washington Law Firm will advocate for your interests during these negotiations. 

9. Trial

If mediation and settlement discussions do not lead to a satisfactory resolution, the case will proceed to trial. Washington Law Firm will present your evidence, question witnesses, and make and defend legal arguments before a judge and jury. The trial process can be lengthy, but Desiree and Washington Law Firm effectively represent your interests in court. 

10. Verdict and Compensation

After the trial, the judge or jury will render a verdict. If the verdict is in your favor, the at-fault party will be ordered to compensate you for your injuries and losses. The compensation can include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. 

Conclusion

While the personal injury process can be challenging, it's crucial to remember that it exists to protect your rights. With Washington Law Firm at your side, you will have the right legal representation and a thorough understanding of the process. You will be able to seek the compensation and justice you deserve in Los Angeles County. 

 

Legal Disclaimer and Attorney Advertising Notice

The information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this website is intended as legal advice. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No attorney-client relationship will be established with our firm or any of our attorneys unless by a written, fully executed engagement letter provided by our firm.

Internet users and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Attorney Desiree T. Washington Announces Run for Los Angeles County Supervisor for the 4th District

Attorney Desiree T. Washington Announces Run for Los Angeles County Supervisor for the 4^th District

Los Angeles, CA, Release: January 9, 2020. For Immediate Release


Attorney Desiree T. Washington is pleased to announce her candidacy for Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for the 4^th District.  This will be Desiree T. Washington’s first bid for public office. Primary Elections will be held March 3, 2020.

Desiree T. Washington is a licensed California attorney. She is a former prosecutor with the State Bar of California, and a former public relations intern for the City of Chicago under the late Mayor Harold Washington. She currently practices business law in the private sector, representing individuals in business and real estate transactions, and consulting with mid-to-large-sized businesses in meeting their large eDiscovery Project Management needs. She regularly manages teams of 30 or more workers to meet high-stakes litigation goals.


Desiree T. Washington obtained a Juris Doctorate from the University of Iowa, College of Law, where she specialized in jurisprudence and civil rights, and where she was appointed research assistant to Professor Kenneth Kress.

Desiree T. Washington received a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Chicago, where she majored in Medieval and Early Modern History, with a minor in the ancient world. She also became an Andrew W. Mellon Undergraduate Fellow while studying at the University of Chicago.


Most recently, Desiree T. Washington has worked as a contract attorney for large law firms, providing substantive legal analysis, managing teams of 25-30+ attorneys in matters of productivity, workflow, quality control issues, and managing general human resources.


“I believe my professional experience makes me uniquely qualified to represent Los Angeles County residents because represents new leadership ready to meet the complex challenges Los Angeles County residents now face by harnessing technology, youthful vigor, creative force and moderate values,” Desiree T. Washington said.  


“Homelessness, Rideshare Safety and Wages, Traffic and Over-Crowding, Taxes, and Pollution Abatement are my immediate concerns,” Desiree T. Washington added. 


“I look forward to serving Los Angeles County,” she concluded.

The 4^th District consists of 458 square miles of land and is home to over 1.9 million residents in the following locales:

Artesia La Habra Heights Rancho Palos Verdes Avalon La Mirada Redondo Beach Bellflower Lakewood Rolling Hills Cerritos Lomita Rowland Heights Diamond Bar Long Beach San Pedro Downey Manhattan Beach Santa Fe Springs El Segundo Marina Del Rey Signal Hill East Whittier Norwalk South Whittier Hacienda Heights Palos Verdes Estates Torrance Harbor City Paramount Westchester Hawaiian Gardens Playa Del Rey West Whittier-Los Nietos Hermosa Beach Rancho Palos Verdes Whittier Redondo Beach Wilmington Rolling Hills

Learn more about Candidate Desiree T. Washington, volunteer, and donate to her campaign by visiting her official campaign website at: Washington for Supervisor 2020,  Twitter: @LASupervisor, Facebook: Desiree4LA, and Instagram: Desiree4LA.

Washington Law Firm is a Los Angeles-based law practice providing legal representation to a diversified client base that includes corporations, small local businesses, individuals, e-commerce brands, hospitals, charities and financial institutions.  Founded in 2001, Washington Law Firm is headquartered in Los Angeles, representing Californians throughout the Southland.


Contact info:
Name: Desiree T. Washington
Organization: Washington Law Firm c/o Washington for Supervisor 2020
Address: 8033 W Sunset Blvd., # 581, Los Angeles, CA 90046
Phone: +1-877-276-4835

Website: https://desireewashington.org

Email: info@desireewashington.com

HOLLYWOOD EXEC SUES EMMYS OVER RED CARPET FALL

Nancy Lesser, executive vice president of media and talent at HBO, has taken legal action against the businesses behind the Emmy Awards for negligence in preparing and maintaining the famed red carpet upon which nominees, winners and guests walk during the awards show. In a lawsuit filed on Tuesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, Lesser alleges she experienced a terrible fall last year when exiting the Microsoft Theater. Her injury, she adds, caused her to miss out on HBO's afterparty and take eight months to rehabilitate.

The complaint targets the Television Academy, Anshutz Entertainment and the City of Los Angeles. Each of the defendants, alleges Lesser, laid out, positioned and erected the red carpet that provided a straight line to and from the theater.

Lesser's suit alleges those responsible for the red carpet knew based on past and present experience with awards shows that "even celebrity attendees to the Emmy Awards could be expected to exit in a throng-like manner, which would create extreme congestion and severely diminish any forward visibility and certainly diminish and preclude visibility of conditions that may exist on the walkway itself."  more